Premier Energies: leading integrated solar PV manufacturer in India
- Ankur Kapur

- 2 days ago
- 4 min read

Premier Energies makes money primarily by manufacturing and selling solar PV cells and modules, with India as the core market and a growing export franchise, and is gradually adding upstream (ingots/wafers) and adjacent products (storage, inverters, EPC) to deepen integration.
Premier Energies Key revenue drivers
The near-term growth engine is volume, driven by large, long-tenor orders from IPPs, OEMs, and rooftop integrators, and by aggressive capacity expansions in cells and modules (targeting multi‑GW additions over FY26).
Pricing power is moderate and cyclical: module and cell ASPs track global polysilicon and wafer prices and domestic competition, but Premier benefits from scale, integrated manufacturing and government PLI/DCR demand, which support better realisations and utilisation versus smaller peers.
Unit economics improve with higher plant load factors and more integrated sourcing (moving into ingots/wafers and balancing‑of‑system products), which reduces per‑watt conversion costs and logistics and increases operating leverage on fixed overheads.
Key Moats
1. Scale + Integrated Manufacturing
Premier has rapidly scaled to around 5+ GW of module capacity and 3+ GW of cell capacity, including new n‑type TOPCon lines, making it the second‑largest integrated cell‑module player in India by cell share.
2. Technology and Quality Reputation
Premier is recognised as an early mover in advanced technologies such as mono‑PERC and n‑type TOPCon cells in India and runs one of the first LEED Gold‑rated cell and module fabs in the country.
3. Customer Relationships and Execution Track Record
The company has a long operating history and has executed supply contracts for large Indian IPPs, government schemes, and rooftop/commercial integrators across the country.
Peer Comparison – How Premier Differs
Aspect | Premier Energies | Waaree Energies | Vikram Solar | Adani Solar |
Scale (modules) | Mid‑large (≈4–5 GW) with integrated cells; ramping TOPCon | Market leader with 13–15 GW+ module capacity, large exports | Mid‑scale; strong in utility and BESS adjacencies | Large integrated (ingots‑to‑modules) capacity |
Technology positioning | Early mover in mono‑PERC and TOPCon; strong cell focus | Broad product range including N‑type/TOPCon; strong module brand | Mix of mono‑PERC and HJT premium segments | Vertically integrated, leveraging group ecosystem |
Market focus | Predominantly domestic; building exports; strong in cells | Large export share plus domestic leadership | Domestic utility + select exports; diversified into storage | Group‑linked projects + external IPPs |
Moat flavour | Integration + technology + efficiency; strong profitability vs size | Sheer scale, brand, distribution, and export footprint | Project relationships and solution play (BESS, EPC) | Group integration, access to capital and captive demand |
Sector Environment and Market Dynamics
Growth Drivers
Government capacity targets: India's 500 GW non-fossil fuel target by 2030 (inclusive of 293 GW solar) is backed by strong policy support, renewable energy certificates (RECs), and a robust tender pipeline; as of September 2024, nearly 127.2 GW of utility-scale solar projects had been tendered or were pending auction.
Technology cost compression: Global average cost of utility-scale solar PV fell 12% in 2023 alone, making solar competitively cheaper than thermal and driving broad acceptance across utility, commercial, and rooftop segments.
Diversifying demand across segments: Utility-scale remains the core (97% on-grid), but off-grid and agricultural solarisation are accelerating, particularly driven by the PM KUSUM scheme for solar-powered agrarian pumps and PM Surya Ghar for residential subsidies (up to INR 78,000 for 3 kW systems).
Barriers to entry are moderate, not high:
Capital intensity: Building a 1–2 GW integrated cell-module fab costs USD 150–250 million; manageable for well-funded private equity or conglomerates but prohibitive for undercapitalised entrepreneurs.
Technology know-how: Mono-PERC and TOPCon cell technology is now commoditised globally; reverse-engineering and licensing from Chinese equipment suppliers is feasible.
Land and utilities: India has allocated solar parks with pre-developed infrastructure, reducing site-specific barriers.
Raw material access: Almost all players source wafers and polysilicon from China, creating a common dependency rather than a differentiation barrier.
Demand-Side Risks
Grid integration and curtailment: Solar curtailment in Rajasthan reached 48% during peak hours in mid-2025, representing $26 million+ in lost revenue for operators. This dampens developer confidence and delays project execution, reducing near-term module demand growth.
Project tender delays and cancellations: ~44 GW of stranded renewable projects lack power purchase agreements (PPAs); the government may cancel projects with poor offtake prospects, directly reducing module procurement.
Interest rate sensitivity: Solar project financing relies on low-cost capital; rising interest rates (8–12% for NBFC and bank loans, down from 12–13% in prior years but still elevated) compress project IRRs and reduce demand for volume.
New Entrants and Margin Compression
Chinese manufacturers staying in India: Chinese module makers (Jinko, LONGi, Trina) continue exporting despite tariffs, using duty-circumvention routes (captive open-access, legacy projects, rooftop).
Capacity oversupply in wafers/ingots: Global wafer capacity reached 1,350+ GW at end-2024 vs. only 12 GW non-Chinese capacity; oversupply has pushed wafer prices to near-loss levels, reducing economics for new entrant wafer manufacturers.
Technology commoditisation: As TOPCon and bifacial become mainstream, the efficiency premium narrows; competing on cost becomes paramount, benefiting only the lowest-cost integrated producers (Waaree, Adani, possibly Premier).
Q2 FY26 Key Financial Highlights
Metric | Q2 FY26 | Q2 FY25 | YoY Growth | Q1 FY26 | QoQ Growth |
Revenue (₹ Cr) | 1,837 | 1,527 | +20.3% | 1,870 | –1.8% (flat) |
EBITDA (₹ Cr) | 561 (est.) | 402 | +39.6% | 598 | –6.2% |
EBITDA Margin % | ~30.5% | 26.3% | +420 bps | 31.9% | –140 bps |
PAT (₹ Cr) | 353 | 206 | +71.6% | 308 | +14.6% |
PAT Margin % | 19.2% | 13.5% | +570 bps | 16.5% | +270 bps |
EPS (₹) | 7.89 | 5.71 | +38.2% | 6.83 | +15.5% |
Order Book: ₹13,250 crore (+₹6,511 crore new wins in Q2); execution cycle 12–18 months
Management's Key Messages
Capacity Expansion Accelerated (18-month advance):
Naidupeta TOPCon cell line: Scaled from 4.8 GW → 7 GW (nominal incremental capex ₹502 Cr; 23% capex saving vs. greenfield)
Total cell capacity: 10.6 GW by September 2026 (advanced from FY28 target)
5.6 GW module capacity is also ramping; target 1.4 GW line stabilisation by December 2025
Two Strategic Acquisitions Announced:
KSolare (Inverters): 51% stake for potential ₹867 Cr; targeting residential inverter market (PM Surya Ghar); plans scale to 1 million units (~3 GW capacity, ₹1,500 Cr revenue potential)
Transcon (Transformers): 51% stake with JV partnership; capacity expanding 2.5 GVA → 16.75 GVA by April 2026; targeting 4x revenue growth in 3 years
New Business Diversification:
BESS (Battery Energy Storage): 6 GWh first phase (June 2026); ₹1,000+ Cr revenue potential in FY27.
Ingot/Wafer: 5 GW phase 1 targeted December 2027 (10 GW phase 2 follows); capex ₹6,000 Cr phased.
Revenue growth stalling, EBITDA margin compression, and management transparency erosion on cell pricing signal that the market is tighter than management admits.






Comments